Feeds


  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

Communities

Visualization

Wordle - BizTechTalk


Wordle - BizTechTalk
Originally uploaded by dankeldsen

Visualization methods come up from time to time, and who am I to resist the siren-call of "yet another tag cloud generator" (YATCG). While I still find most of these visualizations to be fairly useless as navigation devices, in this case, I must say, it looks awfully cool.

Input into Wordle in this case is from my blog. Must have a recency component to it, hence the prominence of search and findability.

Anyone else give Wordle a whirl? Point us to some URLs and let's see the output. As art, I think Wordle is much more interesting to look at than most tag clouds. Would love to be shown evidence of "better" or "more interesting" solutions though.

Post away!

Findability Survey is Now Live - Weigh In!

Market IQ on Findability

Our Q2 2008 research project is the Market IQ on Findability - and the survey to feed our data-driven approach to the quarterly research is now live. Do you have search in your enterprise? At all? Good search? Horrible? User-created tagging? Armies of Taxonomists? An ability to look across applications, repositories, sites in your quest for content, information, or knowledge?

Regardless of the state of organization's Findability Status - your input is extremely important to us. Please, weigh on in, and join the 100 or so people that have already completed the survey in the few hours we've had this open.

The more data the better, and this time around, we are looking not just for business drivers, functionality needed/wanted/hated, but also looking at satisfaction and implementation feedback on the list of companies/solutions provided in a previous post (vote in the survey, not in the blog entry).

Findability and all that it entails, search, taxonomy, user interfaces, information architecture and much, much more, is something that I've been very deeply involved in for the last 8 years, as an instructor, consultant, and implementer, as well as a researcher.

Search isn't solved just yet folks - but there has been quite a revolution in the world of Findability in the last 5 years, and my sense is that adoption at both the trailing and leading edges are still nowhere near where they could be. Would love to be proven wrong, or validated.

For any of the people who had taken our public or private versions of the Proving Ground on Information Architecture and Taxonomy (while I was at Delphi Group), feel free to join in the survey experience. For that matter, would love to hear how your projects have progressed, so feel free to connect with me in the nearly year old role within Market Intelligence at AIIM.org.

The resulting research will be freely available, due in late June, and will have an associated free public webinar as well.

In the short-term, you also have a chance to win 1 of 25 gift certificates for Amazon.com if you provide your e-mail address (so we can contact you if you win), and complete the survey in it's entirety.

I'm monitoring the survey via built-in chat in the footer of each survey page, as well as via Twitter. Any issues, please let me know.

Final List of Findability-related Solutions/Providers

Our Market IQ on Findability survey will be available shortly (feel free to sign up in advance for the webinar in June that will discuss the findings), in the meantime, anyone currently using any of the following solutions, you may want to keep an eye out for the survey launch, and and give us your opinions around Findability.

Not just on the effectiveness of the solution, but on your experiences and concerns with Findability (Search, Taxonomy, Interfaces, Visualization, etc.), to help us uncover the current state of the market, where problems still exist, what benefits you've seen, and so on.

Stay tuned... in the meantime, the list:
alias i (LingPipe)
Ankiro
Antidot
Attivio
Autonomy
Baynote
Bitext
Brainware
Clarabridge
Cogenz
Connectbeam
Connotate Technologies
Consona (KNOVA)
Convera Retrievalware
Conversive
CopperEye
Coveo
Dieselpoint
Dow Jones (Factiva)
Dow Jones (Synaptica)
dtSearch
EMC (askOnce)
Endeca
Exalead
Expert System
FAST
FirstRain
FunnelBack
Google Search Applliance
IBM (Dogear)
IBM (OmniFind)
Infospace
Infovell
Inmagic
InQuira
IntelliSearch
Inxight (Business Objects)
ISYS
Kaidara
Kazeon
Leximancer
Megaputer
Mercado
Microsoft
NextIT
Omniture (Visual Sciences)
OnTopia
Open Text
Oracle (Secure Enterprise Search)
PolySpot
Progress Software (EasyAsk)
Radian6
Raritan Technologies
Recommind
Reuters (Calais)
SAP (NetWeaver Enterprise Search)
SAS (Enterprise Miner)
SchemaLogic
Scuttle
Siderean
SignaText
Sinequa
SLI Systems
SPSS (Clementine)
SPSS (Lexiquest)
StoredIQ
Stratify (Iron Mountain)
Synomia
Temis
Teragram (SAS)
Thunderstone
Verity K2 (Autonomy)
Vivisimo
WCC
Wordmap
X1
Xerox
ZyLAB
Open Source: Lucene
Open Source: Lucene + Solr
Other (please specify)

Visualizations: TweetClouds

Sam Lawrence (CMO for Jive Software, blogging at GoBigAlways), and a number of others on the twittersphere, have been producing visualizations (using "tag cloud" styling) around the "tweets" (maximum 140 character messages posted/sent on twitter.com) of themselves and other high-traffic twitter users.

Sam had been favoring the use of IBM's Many Eyes offering, which provides many ways to visualize information, but requires uploading of content to the service, for it to then chew on. The problem of that service was that the "easy" way to get information out of twitter and into Many Eyes involved cutting and pasting page after page of twitter text.

Noticed yesterday that Stowe Boyd gave tweetclouds.com a whirl, and while I had to hit the site multiple times (timed out, must be overloaded) for it to eventually load my twitter feed (pulled automatically, no cut and paste), it popped out the visualization below.

You can see the impact of the aggregation I'm doing by piping in various lifestreams (my listening habits in iTunes for example) and workstreams (posts to my blog) into my twitter account (via twitterfeed.com). There is also of course the bulk of twitter messages, which are manual tweets from me, responding to various people on twitter, posting open questions, etc..

Sadly this visualization doesn't do two word analysis, or it would be more obvious that "enterprise" and "2.0" are nearly always tied together in my tweets around "enterprise 2.0."

Interested in what anyone else thinks believes this visualization reveals about my twitter activities - too self-promoting? Too broad, too narrow?

TweetClouds_user_pages_dankeldsen.html

Presentation: Folksonomies and Facets

A blast from the past, slightly dusted off... relates to the previous entry on tagging and social bookmarking, and an enterprise view.

The embedded version can be a bit hard to read, so feel free to jump over to slideshare and view full screen, or download the presentation. It's not the slickest presentation, but I've found it useful in introducing people to these concepts, in the 3 years I've used it, time and again.

Thoughts? Who's doing (from a user, not supplier, standpoint) enterprise oriented tagging/bookmarking these days?

Social Bookmarking and Enterprise Value

The value of a random stumble is really underrated. I've known of Thomas Vander Wal for several years, when I first became involved as a member of AifiA (now The Information Architecture Institute), and his very early work in Folksonomies, and helping to bring tagging on a broad basis to light. Great stuff - and I've referenced him in many a presentation.

Haven't had a chance to peek at his blog in, well, ages. Happened to see his commentary on the Yahoo! and Microsoft conundrum recently, and jumped into some of his other, more focused writing on tagging, IA, etc..

Which leads me to his blog entry "Getting More Value in Enterprise with Social Bookmarking" and a few points I'd like to call out.

"The last few weeks I have been running across a few companies postponing or canceling their social computing or Enterprise 2.0 efforts. The reasons vary from the usual budget shifts and staff changes (prior projects were not delivered on time), and leadership roles need filling. But two firms had new concerns of layoffs or budget cuts."

Ok, so since we're just putting the finishing touches on our big research piece on Enterprise 2.0, that first line gave me a bit of a gut-wrenching experience - here I thought (and still do) we were fairly early on in this. But hold on...

"To both firms I pointed out now was the exact time they really needed to focus on some Enterprise 2.0 efforts, particularly social bookmarking as well as wikis and blogs. These solutions help gather information, find value across the organization, capture knowledge, build cohesiveness for members of the organization in time where there there is uncertainty. One of the biggest reasons that these tools make sense is their cost to deploy and receive solid value..." (emphasis mine)

Ah, there we go. While it is certainly possible to break the bank when buying Enterprise 2.0-related technologies, it is much more difficult to overspend in this area, than in most. It's a benefit of SaaS and open source, as well as much more pointed, and easily (relatively) "loosely coupled" solutions. And in the case of social bookmarking specifically, the costs and complexity to deploy are about as inexpensive as anything ever could be. What exactly is the ROI time frame for a solution that literally cost nothing more than the time to install it, which itself, is measured in seconds, minutes, hours, perhaps? I smell a DIVIDE BY ZERO error coming...

Proving the value derived, however, is a much more challenging thing. As anyone who knows me will attest, there are almost no "hard numbers" in my mind, that can ever be completely "trusted" - and whether most organizations actually value their employees (or customers for that matter) wasted time, sorry, that IS something worth addressing, and measuring.

The value of smarter, more informed, more collaborative, and yes, perhaps even "happier" people is certainly worth something. What's the value of information locked away that nobody can ever find? (which happens all too often in ECM deployments) Tell me how you justify spending millions to manage buried content? And how the "high value" yet "work in progress" content can be completely unmanaged and flopping around in e-mail folders? (yet another topic for another day)

And while the benefits of social bookmarking in an Enterprise is definitely for the common good of other users, it's also very self-motivating, as people can (finally) tag the content that they most care about, specifically so they can do their own job. If only all enterprise solutions were actually tailored towards helping the general population, instead of just managers or IT.

The biggest trick of anything even remotely smacking of Knowledge Management, is to stop thinking that magic (technology) can do all of the work for you, or to insist that professional librarians are the only ones that can categorize and organize information.

Every tool or capability has it's place. For tools that are available at no to low cost, it's worth experimenting, and as search vendors such as Vivisimo are showing, integrating tagging within enterprise search, or as Thomas mentions, ConnectBeam and their integration into FAST (and therefore, Microsoft), Google Search Appliance et al, adds even more value than if these capabilities are separated. But that is a topic for another day - and will be part of the discussion in our Q2 Market IQ on Findability.

So for those of you doing "enterprise social bookmarking" whether a specific standalone solution, embedded in a search solution, or perhaps in a wiki or other solution. What say you? Getting value? Significant? What was the cost?

newsmap - news visualization


  newsmap - news visualization 
  Originally uploaded by dankeldsen

I'd forgotten about newsmap, and was reminded of it's existence when I stumbled on the Periodic Table of Visualization Methods. Always interesting to look at alternatives to raw text-based lists of headlines.

For daily use? No. As a way to discover rather than explicitly find? Yes - and let's remember that search/find isn't always about finding THE needle in ye olde haystacke. May want to stumble around a bit.

Twitter

Last 3 Comments

Feel the Rush


  • Featured in Alltop
  • ss_blog_claim=979124f7ac7da11838fc99d4426b903d